Nearly a quarter of the northern hemisphere, an area twice
the size of the United States is covered in permafrost - soil that is frozen
for at least 2 years straight. But, contrary to its name, Permafrost is not as
permanent as one would believe. The Earth is warming at an alarming speed with
the Arctic warming at twice as fast. Across these barely inhabited regions, where
winter temperatures can dip below -50°C, the ground is starting to give way. Rapid
erosion and collapsing sinkholes are causing irreparable damage for housing,
roads, pipelines, but the real worry is below the surface. When permafrost
thaws, rich deposits of organic material, from animal carcasses and old plants,
are uncovered and become food for microbes that produce carbon dioxide and, from
pooling water in thermokarst lakes, methane. These releases of greenhouses
gasses in turn warm the earth and produce a continuous feedback loop that accelerates
climate change. Unlike other sources of
greenhouse gases, the difficulty with melting permafrost is that we cannot
directly control it.
Northern permafrost contains 1600 billion tons of carbon - twice as much carbon
than is currently found in the atmosphere or three times as much as what is
locked in the world forests. Due to a lack of understanding of permafrost
thawing profiles, estimates vary widely on its environmental impact. If we’re
good, permafrost can actually help us sequester carbon. If we’re not, then it’
a ticking time bomb. Some scientists predict thawing of 5-15% of the permafrost
in the next two decades, which would result in a 0.27°C rise. If we want to
limit the global temperature rise to less than 1.5°C from pre-industrial
levels, emissions from permafrost alone can use up a quarter of our carbon budget.
It’s important to include secondary climate change effects into
carbon calculations. 1kg of carbon dioxide released in the atmosphere can
result in an out-sized and unpredictable effect.
There has been a lot
of media attention on the US’s Green New Deal. However, nearly all reports have
been engrossed with the politics of the resolution and not much on its contents.
So what is really in it?
The Green New Deal is
not a bill, nor legislation, nor policy. It is more of a proposal that can’t be
used to make any laws. Basically, it acknowledges that we are in a climate
crisis and gives some idea of what it might take to solve it. The document
contains two parts.
The first section
discusses what we know about impending climate crisis and what we need to do to
avoid the impending consequences. Essentially, it says that it is too late to
incrementally move away from fossil fuels. Instead, we need to make a drastic
step change in eliminating the burning of fossil fuels. This includes changing
the way we build buildings, generate electricity, source food and make steel.
This is a huge undertaking, but the process will create new economies, new jobs
and new money.
Of course, there is a
flip side. Decarbonizing will cause economic pain for traditional industries.
So, the second section of the Green New Deal suggests ways to protect Americans
during the sudden change. This includes suggestions such as re-education and
training, public welfare, universal income and quality healthcare. It says that
the American economy should be rebuilt in a way that allows opportunity to flow
more fairly thought the population.
The Green New Deal does not make any
assurances or commitments. It also does not detail how ideas are to be
implemented. It is just provides a first step on the path to a decarbonized
country. This contentious resolution will be voted on at the 116th United
States Congress on March 26th.
Published Feb 25,
2019
Carbon dioxide is a problematic greenhouse gas contributing to global
warming. Power plants are major emitters of carbon dioxide, but
unfortunately, current methods of capturing and storing excess carbon
dioxide have not been very effective. Only a small amount of carbon
dioxide actually gets stored permanently. But researchers at Columbia
University have demonstrated that their unique carbon capture and
storage process can actually convert carbon dioxide into environmentally
friendly limestone in less than two years. GYL's Fanny Yuen joined BBC's Naked Scientists to speak with Dr.
Juerg Matter to hear more about his pilot study.
Credit: Juerg Matter
The US and Europe are benning microparticle beads from personal care products. Researchers from Uppsala University are able to
show that fish actually prefer to eat microplastic particles rather
than their own food of zooplankton, causing disastrous effects to their
survival. GYL's Fanny Yuen joined BBC's Naked Scientists to speak with Dr. Oona Lönnstedt to better understand
the issue.
Credit: Oona Lönnstedt
We're sure you've noticed the big changes to our website. We are currently updating. Apologies for the inconvenience. We are in the process of re-uploading our content.
Note: Questions and response may be slightly edited to fit website reading. Original text is kept where possible